Mark Zuckerberg: ‘I’m really sorry that this happened’

Mark Zuckerberg has regrets.

“I’m really sorry that this happened,” the Facebook CEO told CNN’s Laurie Segall in an exclusive TV interview on Wednesday.

News broke this weekend that Cambridge Analytica, a data firm with ties to President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, accessed information from 50 million Facebook users without their knowledge, and might have kept that data even after Facebook told the company to delete it.

The revelation put Facebook and Zuckerberg under the microscope for their handling of user data and privacy.

Zuckerberg addressed the scandal publicly through a Facebook post on Wednesday. He wrote that the company made “mistakes” and outlined how it has changed its policies to make sure that user data is protected.

“I wish we’d taken those steps earlier,” Zuckerberg told Segall. “That … is probably the biggest mistake that we made here.”

In 2014, Facebook changed its platform to limit the amount of data that third-party developers could access.

Aleksandr Kogan, the data scientist who passed along data to SCL Group and its affiliate Cambridge Analytica, built a Facebook app that drew data from users and their friends in 2013. He was allowed access to a broad range of data at the time.

Though Kogan’s data was properly obtained, he breached Facebook’s policy when he shared that information with a third party, Facebook has said. When Facebook learned about the information being shared, it asked Cambridge Analytica to destroy the data. Cambridge said it had.

But a former contractor, Christopher Wylie, disputes that Cambridge Analytica destroyed the user data.

Zuckerberg told Segall that he regrets taking Cambridge Analytica at its word. “This was clearly a mistake,” he said.

Zuckerberg said Facebook plans to alert everyone whose data was accessed by Cambridge Analytica. But he added that he wishes the company hadn’t waited so long to tell people what happened.

“That’s definitely something that, looking back on this, I regret that we didn’t do at the time,” he told CNN. “I think we got that wrong.”

And he said he’s made other mistakes along the way.

“I started this when I was so young and inexperienced,” the 33-year-old Zuckerberg said. “I made technical errors and business errors. I hired the wrong people. I trusted the wrong people,” he said.

“I’ve probably launched more products that have failed than most people will in their lifetime.”

But ultimately, he said, he’s learned from his missteps.

“That’s the commitment that I try to have inside our company and for our community.”

Trump prepared to sit out Mississippi special election (for now)

Top aides to President Donald Trump told Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant in a phone call this week that the president would be sitting out the state’s special election, an administration official told CNN Wednesday.

The official initially said the conversation was between Trump and Bryant, but later clarified that it was actually top Trump aides who conveyed the message to the Mississippi Republican.

That means Trump does not plan to endorse or campaign for either Republican Cindy Hyde-Smith or Chris McDaniel in what is shaping up to be a hotly contested race. The official said that could change and that the White House would continue to monitor the contest.

Bryant on Wednesday tapped Hyde-Smith, the Mississippi Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce, to replace Sen. Thad Cochran, who is retiring. McDaniel is a Mississippi State senator and conservative activist who is challenging Hyde-Smith for the reliably Republican seat.

There won’t be a party primary for the special election in Mississippi, and the election will be non-partisan, with no party identification for the candidates on the ballot. If no candidate gets 50 percent, a runoff will be held.

The White House message to Bryant was that the president was not prepared to endorse anyone in the primary at this time, but noted that the decision was subject to change.

Aides spoke to Trump about the Mississippi race on Tuesday, the official said, and the president “expressed his desire to not weigh into the race at this time.”

The official added that Trump doesn’t have an issue with Hyde-Smith, but aides told the governor that the president didn’t want to get involved in what will likely be a race between the two Republicans.

Trump’s decision to wade into the special election in Alabama last year looms over this decision. Trump endorsed Luther Strange in 2017, only to have the establishment-backed lawmaker lose in the primary to Republican Roy Moore. Then Trump endorsed Moore, who eventually lost to Democrat Doug Jones after women came forward to allege that Moore sexually abused them as teenagers.

Republicans, including Trump, urged Bryant to appoint himself to the seat vacated by Cochran’s retirement, but the governor said no and opted to nominated Hyde-Smith, who was a Democrat as recently as 2010 when she served in the state Senate.

McDaniel, signaling how he will attack Hyde-Smith in the primary, went after her history as a Democrat on Wednesday.

“Before Commissioner Hyde-Smith was elected to lead the Department of Agriculture, her only legislative experience was that of a Democrat. She ran as a Democrat. She served as a Democrat. She voted like a Democrat,” McDaniel said. “Although her reputation in Jackson was that of a moderate Democrat, the last thing the state of Mississippi needs in Washington is another moderate Democrat.”

Hyde-Smith, preparing for a fight against McDaniel, highlighted her conservatism on Wednesday.

“I’ve been conservative all of my life and that’s demonstrated by my conservative voting record as a three-term state senator and my conservative accomplishments as Agriculture Commissioner,” she said.

Her campaign later sent out a list of two dozen endorsements Hyde-Smith has received from an array of Republican lawmakers, including one from Bryant referring to her as a “rock-solid conservative.”

White House officials declined to officially comment about Trump’s view of the Mississippi race.

Update: This story has been updated to reflect that a source clarified to CNN that it was top aides to Trump who spoke to Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant, not Trump himself, as the source originally indicated.

China: We will hit back if US announces new tariffs

Beijing has renewed a warning that it will retaliate if President Donald Trump goes through with plans to slap new tariffs on Chinese goods worth billions of dollars.

“China will certainly take all necessary measures to resolutely defend its legitimate rights and interests,” if the United States imposes new restrictions, the Ministry of Commerce said in a statement on Thursday.

Trump is widely expected to announce new tariffs on $60 billion worth of Chinese exports to the United States later in the day. That’s a little more than 10% of all Chinese goods sent to the United States in 2017.

Trump has repeatedly accused Beijing of unfair trade practices like currency manipulation — which helps China make its exports more affordable — and of stealing US intellectual property. The president has frequently taken aim at China’s huge goods trade surplus with the United States, which reached $375 billion last year.

The tariffs would be the first time the Trump administration has directly targeted China with big trade sanctions. Previous measures against steel, aluminum and solar panels have applied to imports from other countries too.

China has repeatedly said that it doesn’t want a trade war but warned that it would take “firm and necessary” countermeasures if necessary.

“It’s unrealistic and unreasonable to demand complete equality in trade,” Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying told reporters on Thursday. “We hope that both sides can sit down and talk calmly.”

Beijing hasn’t offered any specifics on how it could respond, but it does have a number of options.

For example, it is one of the biggest buyers of US crops, including soybeans or sorghum. China could put a tariff on those, or decide to buy more soy from places like Brazil and Argentina.

Boeing might also be vulnerable in the longer term. It’s the single largest US exporter, and China is a critical market for the company. Chinese airlines could place more orders for Airbus planes in future.

China is also the biggest creditor of the United States: It owns more US government bonds than any other country. It recently cut some of its US debt holdings, though investors don’t expect China to immediately dump its US debt.

China’s Global Times, a state tabloid that often voices nationalist views, said in an editorial this week that any suggestion China would suffer more than the United States in a trade war was “arrogant and naïve.”

It pointed to soybeans as one area where it could put the squeeze on US exporters.

“If China halves the proportion of the US soybean imports, it will not have any major impact on China, but the US bean farmers will complain. They were mostly Trump supporters. Let them confront Trump,” the newspaper said.

— CNN’s Daniel Shane contributed to this article.

Mark Zuckerberg in his own words: The CNN interview

Mark Zuckerberg sat down for an exclusive interview with CNN’s Laurie Segall on Wednesday, days after news broke that Cambridge Analytica, a data firm with ties to President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, accessed information from 50 million Facebook users without their knowledge.

Zuckerberg apologized for the scandal, discussed Facebook’s efforts to prevent bad actors for meddling in the 2018 midterm elections and shared his regrets. Read excerpts from the emotional interview below.

What went wrong

Laurie Segall: I’m gonna start with just a basic question, Mark, what happened? What went wrong?

Mark Zuckerberg: So this was a major breach of trust and I’m really sorry that this happened. You know we have a basic responsibility to protect people’s data and if we can’t do that then we don’t deserve to have the opportunity to serve people. So our responsibility now is to make sure that this doesn’t happen again. And there are a few basic things that I think we need to do to ensure that. One is making sure that developers like Aleksandr Kogan, who got access to a lot of information and then improperly used it, just don’t get access to as much information going forward. So we are doing a set of things to restrict the amount of access that developers can get going forward. But the other is we need to make sure that there aren’t any other Cambridge Analyticas out there. Right, or folks who have improperly accessed data. So we’re gonna go now and investigate every app that has access to a large amount of information from before we locked down our platform. And if we detect any suspicious activity we’re gonna do a full forensic audit.

What Facebook’s doing now

Zuckerberg: We’re going to review thousands of apps. So, this is gonna be an intensive process, but this is important. I mean this is something that in retrospect we clearly should have done, upfront, with Cambridge Analytica. We should not have trusted the certification that they gave us. And we’re not gonna make that mistake again. I mean this is our responsibility to our community, is to make sure that we secure the data that they’re sharing with us.

Segall: Will you take legal action against Cambridge Analytica?

Zuckerberg: Well the first thing that we need to do is actually understand what happened. So, you know, right now we have the report from the Times and the Guardian and Channel 4 that said that they thought that Cambridge Analytica might have access to data still. But the first thing that we need to do is complete our audit there… the short answer is that if we go in and find that Cambridge Analytica still has access to the data, we’re gonna take all legal steps that we can to make that the data of people in our community is protected.

What he regrets

Segall: Respond to the users who say you didn’t get in front of it because we’re here talking about it today.

Zuckerberg: Well, clearly I wish we’d taken those steps earlier. I mean, that, that I think is probably the biggest mistake that we made here … the feedback from the community and the world has overwhelmingly been, that, if you balance these two values of being able to take your data and some data from friends to be able to have social experiences on other apps on the one hand, this ideal of kind of data portability. And on the other hand, making sure that your data’s always locked down. Guaranteeing that it never goes anywhere. You know I think we’ve started off a little bit on the idealistic, and maybe naive side, right, of thinking that that vision around data portability and enabling social apps was gonna be what our community preferred, and I think what we’ve learned over time very clearly is that the most important thing always is making sure that people’s data is locked down. And that’s a mistake that … we fixed a few years back and I don’t expect us to make again.

On ‘selling data’

Segall: Is your business model on trial here?

Zuckerberg: You know, one of the big misconceptions about Facebook is this idea that we somehow sell data. We don’t sell any data to anyone and that’s actually a really key part of the model. Both for protecting people’s personal data and privacy, but also because, you know the competitive advantage of a lot of our services, whether that’s ranking News Feed or ranking search or even ranking ads is that people do share a lot of information on Facebook and therefore we can build better services. So we don’t want data to be able to get out. When that happens, that’s not good for people in our community, that’s not good for our business. So, that’s not actually how ads work on the service and it actually has never been. An advertiser can come to us and say, “Hey, I’d like to reach women within this age range” and if we understand who is in that then we can show that ad but none of that information goes to the advertiser.

How Facebook is fighting election meddling

Zuckerberg: I think what’s clear is that in 2016, we were not as on top of a number of issues as we should have [been] whether it was Russian interference or fake news. But what we have seen since then is, a number of months later there was a major French election, and there we deployed some AI tools that did a much better job of identifying Russian bots and basically Russian potential interference and weeding that out of the platform ahead of the election. And we were much happier with how that went. In 2017, last year, during the special election, the senate seat in Alabama, we deployed some new AI tools that we built to detect fake accounts that were trying to spread false news and we found a lot of different accounts coming from Macedonia. So, I think the reality here is that this isn’t rocket science. Right? And there’s a lot of hard work that we need to do to make it harder for nation-states like Russia to do election interference, to make it so that trolls and other folks can’t spread fake news, but we can get in front of this. And we have a responsibility to do this, not only for the 2018 midterms in the U.S., which are going to be a huge deal this year and that’s just a huge focus for us but there’s a big election in India this year, there’s a big election in Brazil, there are big elections around the world, and you can bet that we are really committed to doing everything that we need to to make sure that the integrity of those elections on Facebook is secured.

On attempts to manipulate the midterm elections

Segall: Do you think that bad actors are using Facebook at this moment to meddle with the U.S. midterm elections?

Zuckerberg: I’m sure someone’s trying. Right? I’m sure that there’s V2, version two of whatever the Russian effort was in 2016, I’m sure they’re working on that and there are going to be some new tactics that we need to make sure that we observe and get in front of —

Segall: Do you know what the — speaking of getting in front of them, do you know what they are?

Zuckerberg: Yes, and I think we have some sense of the different things that we need to get in front of and we have a lot of different folks in the company, both building technology and, a lot of this stuff requires people to review things and that’s one of the big commitments that we’ve made this year is to double the number of people working on security at the company. We’re going to have 20,000 people working on security and content review in this company by the end of this year. We have about 15,000 people working on security and content review now. So I think the combination of building the right tools to identify different patterns across all of our products and having people to review them at the scale and speed that we need is going to be a good formula, but you know, security isn’t a problem that you ever fully solve. You can get to the level where you’re better than your adversaries and they continue evolving, so we’re going to be working on this forever, as long as this community remains an important thing in the world.

Segall: Are you specifically seeing bad actors trying to meddle with the U.S. election now?

Zuckerberg: What we see are a lot of folks trying to sew division. Right? So that was a major tactic that we saw Russia try to use in the 2016 election. Actually most of what they did was not directly, as far as we can tell from the data that we’ve seen, was not directly about the election, but was more about just dividing people. You know, so they’d run a group for pro-immigration reform and they’d run another group against immigration reform to just try to pit people against each other. And a lot of this was done with fake accounts that we could do a better job of tracing and using AI tools to be able to scan and observe a lot of what is going on and I’m confident that we’re going to do a much better job. Now the reality is with a community of two billion people, I can’t promise that we’re going to find everything. But what I can commit to is that we’re going to make it as hard as possible for these adversaries to do that and I think that we’re going to do a much better job.

Testifying before Congress

Segall: Lawmakers in the United States and the UK are asking you to testify. Everybody wants you to show up. Will you testify before Congress?

Zuckerberg: So, the short answer is I’m happy to, if it’s the right thing to do. Facebook testifies in Congress regularly on a number of topics, some high profile and some not. And our objective is always to provide Congress, who does an extremely important job, to have the most information that they can. We see a small slice of activity on Facebook, but Congress gets to have access to the information across Facebook and all other companies and the intelligence community and everything. So what we try to do is send the person at Facebook who will have the most knowledge about what Congress is trying to learn. So if that’s me, then I am happy to go. What I think we’ve found so far is that typically there are people whose whole job is focused on an area, but I would imagine at some point that there would be a topic where I am the sole authority on and that would make sense for me to do and I’ll be happy to do it at that point.

Whether Facebook should be regulated

Segall: Given the stakes here, why shouldn’t Facebook be regulated?

Zuckerberg: I actually am not sure we shouldn’t be regulated. I think in general technology is an increasingly important trend in the world and I actually think the question is more, what is the right regulation rather than “Yes or no, should it be regulated?”

Segall: What’s the right regulation?

Zuckerberg: Well there’s some basic things, then I think there are some big intellectual debates. On the basic side, I think there are things like ads transparency regulation that I would love to see. If you look at how much regulation there is around advertising on TV and print, it’s just not clear why there should be less on the internet. We should have the same level of transparency required. And I don’t know if the bill is going to pass. I know a couple of senators are working really hard on this, but we’re committed and we’ve actually already started rolling out ad transparency tools that accomplish most of the things that are in all the bills that people are talking about today because this is an important thing. People should know who is buying the ads that they see on Facebook, and you should be able to go on any page and see all the ads that people are running to different audiences. So we actually already have this running in Canada as a test and our goal is to get this running here well before the 2018 midterms, so that way we’ll have that new, higher standard of transparency in place for the 2018 midterms in the U.S. There are broader regulation questions as well, but that’s actually an easy one.

Growing pains

Segall: So you’ve been the leader of Facebook for 14 years. Looking back on all your time, because we don’t get to hear Mark, personal Mark that often, do you have any moments that you look at that are regrets? If you could look at one moment as something you regretted that you really wish now you could have changed or you could have done, what would it be?

Zuckerberg: Oh, I don’t know. I mean, there are so many mistakes that I’ve made. I started this company when I was 19. I was a kid.

Segall: What do you say to your 19-year-old self in a dorm room?

Zuckerberg: I think a pretty common question is “What mistake do you wish you’d not made?” but the reality is you can make a ton of mistakes in your life, no matter what you do and you know, I’ve made, I’ve made every kind of mistake that you can make. I mean I started this when I was so young and inexperienced, right? I made technical errors and business errors. I hired the wrong people. I trusted the wrong people. I’ve probably launched more products that have failed than most people will in their lifetime. But you know I think the thing that makes Facebook work for people, is not that there weren’t mistakes; it’s that we learned from them. Right, and that’s the commitment that I try to have inside our company and for our community is that yeah, maybe you’re not gonna get everything right. The world changes. There are gonna be new challenges that come up.

How being a father changed him

Segall: How has being a father changed your commitment to users, changed your commitment to their future and what a kinder Facebook looks like?

Zuckerberg: Well, I think, having kids changes a lot. And-

Segall: Like what?

Zuckerberg: Well, you know I used to think that the most important thing to me by far was, you know my having the greatest positive impact across the world that I can and, now I really just care about building something that my girls are gonna grow up and be proud of me for. And that’s what is kind of my guiding philosophy at this point is and you know I come and work on a lot of hard things during the day and I go home and just ask will my girls be proud of what I did today?

— CNN’s Rob McLean and Danielle Wiener-Bronner contributed.

National Film Board Launches “Indigenous Cinema” (#NFBIndigenous) Online

Published March 22, 2018 MONTREAL – On March 22, the National Film Board of Canada will launch Indigenous Cinema (#NFBIndigenous),  an NFB Web page offering free streaming of more than 200 new and classic titles from its unparalleled collection of films by Indigenous directors—including 20 new and recently added films. Indigenous Cinema has been developed as part of the NFB’s three-year Indigenous […]

The post National Film Board Launches “Indigenous Cinema” (#NFBIndigenous) Online appeared first on Native News Online.

Facebook changes: How will my account be different?

Facebook has vowed to change its data-sharing ways. But will the differences actually impact users?

After days of silence following a massive data scandal, CEO Mark Zuckerberg finally commented on the issue in a Facebook post and later in interviews with CNN and other outlets.

The scandal stems from new reporting that Cambridge Analytica, a data firm with ties to President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, which had accessed information from 50 million Facebook users without their knowledge, might have kept that data even after Facebook told the company to delete it.

Zuckerberg’s lengthy post laid out a number of steps the company would take to regain user trust. A secondary post detailed the company’s plans for cracking down on third-party developers that make Facebook apps.

Many of the announced changes will happen behind the scenes or in settings casual users don’t visit often — or don’t know exist.

App awareness

Facebook does want to be more transparent about which apps can see your information, though. Sometime within the next month, Facebook will promote its Settings page that lists the apps that have access to your account. It will now give this tool prime real estate at the top of your News Feed.

When you use Facebook to log into services like Tinder or Uber, you give the companies access to some of your personal information. The exact data varies app to app but can include your name, birthday and email address — or vastly more personal data, such as private messages and a list of your friends. The data can help the apps tailor their services to you.

The app review tool will let you revoke any app permissions right away. The functionality currently exists on Facebook’s Settings page, but the new prominent placement will mean it can reach many more people. It’s unclear if the tools will look the same.

Close review

Zuckerberg said Facebook will review all apps that have been pulling large amounts of data about users since 2014 and earlier. That’s when the company changed its policies to limit what information third-party apps that you use could gather about your friends and started reviewing apps that asked for extensive data.

If Facebook discovers any other misuse of personal data, it will ban the app, Zuckerberg said.

“We’re going to review thousands of apps,”Zuckerberg told CNN’s Laurie Segall in an exclusive interview. “So, this is gonna be an intensive process, but this is important. This is something that in retrospect we clearly should have done, upfront, with Cambridge Analytica.”

Impacted users

Facebook is working on a “way for people to know” if their data was accessed by the Cambridge Analytica survey, the company said in a post. It’s not clear if this is something users will have to proactively search for, as was the case with its tool to inform people who may have been exposed to content produced by the Russian troll army that exploited the platform, or if they will be notified.

The company said if it finds others apps that have misused data in its investigation process, it will take action to inform all users of that app.

“One of the most important things we need to do here is make sure that we tell everyone whose data was affected by one of these rogue apps,” Zuckerberg told Segall. “And we’re gonna do that. We’re gonna build a tool where anyone can go and see if their data was a part of this.”

Cut-off time

Facebook is tweaking how it handles existing apps’ access to your personal information. If you haven’t used an app in three months, its access will automatically be removed. New apps that haven’t been through the company’s existing review process will not be able to access anything other than a person’s name, profile photo and email address.

Same look and feel

Most users don’t think too much about third-party apps. They check the platform for photos and updates from friends, and scroll past Facebook ads that are based on the vast amounts of data the company has collected about them over the years. That core experience will stay the same for the time being.

But by putting a tool on top of the News Feed that shows everyone what apps they’ve installed, Facebook is reminding users that their data is being shared and used. And that could change how people look at the social network.

Centering Native People in Racial Justice

Published March 22, 2018 “Settler states in the Americas are founded on, and maintained through, policies of direct extermination, displacement, or assimilation. The premise of each is to ensure that Indigenous peoples ultimately disappear as peoples, so that settler nations can seamlessly take their place. Because of the intensity of genocidal policies that Indigenous people […]

The post Centering Native People in Racial Justice appeared first on Native News Online.