Controversies harm Northam in Va. governor’s race

Democrats’ biggest worry in the Virginia governor’s race has long been that minority voters wouldn’t turn out in full force to support Lt. Gov. Ralph Northam.

Now, a series of stumbles in the race’s final week have threatened his campaign — potentially hurting Northam with some of those minority voters and energizing President Donald Trump’s supporters who had been lukewarm about Republican candidate Ed Gillespie.

Northam has spent the closing days of the race attempting to energize minority voters, particularly black voters in Richmond and eastern Virginia. He campaigned Wednesday night with two of the most prominent black Democrats, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker and Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison, the Democratic National Committee deputy chair.

“This country is looking for hope,” Booker said in Arlington. “This whole country right now is waiting to see what is going to happen in Virginia on Tuesday.”

Late last month, former President Barack Obama held an event in Richmond warning Democrats against complacency in non-presidential elections.

Meanwhile, outside groups have focused on minority turnout. BlackPAC is spending $1.1 million on field organizing, mail, digital and radio advertisements. Justin Fairfax, the 38-year-old Democratic candidate for lieutenant governor, will canvass with the group Sunday in Hampton Roads.

NextGen America, the group funded by billionaire environmentalist Tom Steyer, has worked with CASA in Action, America’s Voice and the Center for Community Change Action on a field program targeting Latino and immigrant voters.

Those involved in the efforts said Virginia will provide key lessons for Democrats about how to mobilize minority voters in the 2018 midterm elections, when the Democratic electorate has typically dropped off from presidential elections more than the GOP electorate.

“I can’t tell you how many times we were knocking on a door two weeks ago or three weeks ago, and voters didn’t even know the ads were out there — didn’t even know that there was a Virginia election. There has to be early investment in Latino and immigrant voters, because the ways that they find information is different than the typical voter,” said Grecia Lima, the deputy national political director at the Center for Community Change Action.

But two issues have dogged Northam in the closing days of the race as Gillespie’s campaign works to cast him as offensive to white Trump voters.

First was a minute-long Latino Victory Fund ad, backed by only $30,000 in television spending. It featured four minority children being chased through their neighborhoods by a white man driving a pick-up truck with a Confederate flag and a Gillespie bumper sticker.

The ad gave Gillespie’s camp an opening to accuse Democrats of painting all conservatives as racist. His campaign said online fundraising had skyrocketed in the wake of news reports about the ad and has made a point of highlighting it as an example of what it sees as Northam’s disdain for Trump supporters in the race’s closing days.

In an interview with The Daily Caller, Gillespie said his family was bothered by the ad.

“They are infuriated,” he said. “And they’re disgusted. And I understand that. I think it’s always harder on the family than on the candidate himself or herself, but it’s not pleasant, and it’s the kind of thing that makes good people not want to run for public office.”

Then, on Wednesday night, Northam was pressed by reporters on sanctuary cities, where local law enforcement officials don’t help enforce federal immigration laws.

Virginia has no such cities. And when the state legislature sought to ban them, Northam, in his role as president of the state senate, cast a tie-breaking vote to defeat the bill.

That vote led Gillespie to air ads for six weeks accusing Northam of opening the door for MS-13 gangs to rampage through Virginia’s cities, featuring the words “Kill, Rape, Control.”

On Wednesday, Northam told reporters that he opposes sanctuary cities — and would actually support the bill that his vote killed were Virginia to ever actually have one.

“I think what’s important to understand is if a city declares itself a sanctuary city, and … the General Assembly passes a law saying that’s unlawful, I would support that,” Northam told reporters Wednesday night.

It’s led to a new round of accusations of flip-flopping by Gillespie’s campaign and his allies. The Virginia GOP said in an email to reporters Thursday that Northam needs to answer “specific and very important,” questions to clarify why he voted against the bill banning sanctuary cities.

Liberal group leaves campaign

By announcing his opposition to sanctuary cities, Northam also triggered backlash from the left.

Democracy For America, which had spearheaded a calling program for Democratic candidates as part of progressives’ coordinated effort in Virginia, announced that it was dropping its support for Northam and only working to help the rest of the ticket.

“Ralph Northam’s gutless, politically senseless, and morally debased decision yesterday to openly backtrack on his commitment to standing up for immigrant families is a picture-perfect example of why Democracy for America never endorsed him in the primary and focused the entirety of our efforts in Virginia on down-ticket races, like Justin Fairfax’s campaign for lieutenant governor. It’s also why, today, we’re announcing that we will no longer do any work to directly aid Northam’s gubernatorial efforts,” DFA executive director Charles Chamberlain said in a statement.

It re-opened wounds from an October clash when Northam’s campaign omitted Fairfax from literature being handed out by the Laborers’ International Union of North America, which had asked for the omission because it hadn’t endorsed Fairfax. Leaving his black ticketmate off literature that featured Northam and Attorney General Mark Herring provoked outrage, particularly on social media.

Chamberlain called that a “racist action” but said DFA didn’t discuss it publicly “for the sake of Democratic comity.” But opposition sanctuary cities was too far, he said, calling Northam’s campaign “disastrous, racist, and voter-turnout-depressing.”

“Let’s be really clear: If Ralph Northam wins next Tuesday, it won’t be because he publicly backtracked on his commitment to protecting immigrant families, but in spite of it,” Chamberlain said. “And, if he loses, the blame should be placed squarely on the shoulders of the consultants who urged the campaign to cave on core Democratic values in the face of a virulently racist Republican campaign – and whose obsession with flipping white, Republican-leaning votes and ignoring voters of color has consistently failed.”

Polls all over the place

The race has swung wildly in the polls, with some showing Northam holding a small lead and others showing him ahead of Gillespie by double digits. A Suffolk University poll out this week showed Northam’s lead at 4 percentage points, while a Washington Post/Schar Center poll had him up by 5 points.

But a Quinnipiac University poll this week pegged Northam’s edge at 17 points.

That it’s Northam on the defensive in the Virginia governor’s race is a remarkable turn in a contest that has seen Gillespie air a series of ads that Latino and immigration groups, and many Republicans, have seen as stoking racial tensions.

Gillespie’s ads have attacked Northam for Gov. Terry McAuliffe’s decision to automatically restore the voting rights of felons who have completed their sentences, and for arguing for the removal of Confederate monuments. Gillespie says in one ad that he’s for keeping those statues up, and calls it “a big difference in November.”

“So the last 3 ads by @EdWGillespie are: gangs, people getting their voting rights back, and monuments. The dog whistle is a little loud, Ed,” tweeted Doug Stafford, an adviser to Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul.

Veteran Republican strategist Al Cardenas tweeted a week ago: “Ed Gillespie used to be the champion of diversity in GOP….”

But Cardenas hit Northam days later, when the Latino Victory Fund ad began to air. He tweeted: “This is worse. Shame on Northam & his campaign.”

Follow this story

Va. governor on election interference: ‘It’s treason’

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe suggests special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation could reveal a stark conclusion: treason.

“I mean the bottom line, the crux of this entire issue, is that people were working with a foreign government who you know is not working in our best interests to destabilize our elections and to destabilize our country,” McAuliffe told David Axelrod on “The Axe Files,” a podcast from the University of Chicago Institute of Politics and CNN.

“If we find that any U.S. citizen was involved in this, it’s treason,” he said.

“We’ll see where it goes,” the Virginia Democrat said of Mueller’s indictments of Paul Manafort, Rick Gates, and George Papadopoulos this week. Papadopoulos, who served as a foreign policy adviser for the Trump campaign, pleaded guilty to making a false statement to the FBI after he lied about his interactions with foreign officials close to the Russian government. Manafort and Gates pleaded not guilty.

McAuliffe said he thinks someone with knowledge of the U.S. election “had to give (the Russians) a roadmap of who to talk to, what names to put on memos and things.” And while he doesn’t believe there’s evidence yet of treason, he does think the impact of the Russia’s interference in the 2016 campaign is apparent.

“Look at the destabilization in our country today that’s been wrought because of this,” McAullffe said. “You know we’ve got issues with NATO today. Look at the issues going on with North Korea.”

“This is just the beginning, I think, of a long series of things that are about to come,” he said of Mueller’s investigation.

Looking ahead to next week’s election for his gubernatorial successor, McAuliffe said that he believes the Republican candidate, Ed Gillespie, is running with the “Trump playbook.”

“People are happy with our economy and Ed can’t run on that so he’s got to take the Trump playbook and divide people,” McAuliffe said.

The current Virginia governor took particular issue with Gillespie’s attack ads, which warn of the MS-13 gang and sanctuary cities (which McAuliffe notes do not exist in Virginia) and tout the preservation of Confederate monuments. Some Democrats have accused Gillespie of using the ads to stoke racial fears — an accusation with which McAuliffe agrees.

“This is not the Ed Gillespie I knew, but the Ed Gillespie (in) this campaign is racist, bigoted, hurtful,” he told Axelrod. “As a candidate, you own your ads. Plain and simple.”

Asked whether he harbors any aspirations of seeking the highest political office — the presidency — when he ends his term next year, McAuliffe said he has “no idea” what he’ll be doing in 2020. He noted he plans to travel to support Democratic gubernatorial candidates, saying his focus is squarely on the 2018 races.

“It drives me wild when Democrats talk about 2020. Because if we don’t have a successful night in 2018, and we’re going to get redistricted … our party and the principles we care about are going to get wiped out,” he said.

However, when pressed about whether he would rule out a run, McAuliffe said he’d “never rule anything out,”

“We’ll see where life takes you,” he said.

Follow this story

Facebook estimates 126 million people were served content from Russia-linked pages

Facebook will inform lawmakers this week that roughly 126 million Americans may have been exposed to content generated on its platform by the Russian government-linked troll farm known as the Internet Research Agency between June 2015 and August 2017, …

Follow this story

Facebook estimates 126 million people were served content from Russia-linked pages

Facebook will inform lawmakers this week that roughly 126 million Americans may have been exposed to content generated on its platform by the Russian government-linked troll farm known as the Internet Research Agency between June 2015 and August 2017, …

Follow this story

Twitter pulls RT, Sputnik advertising

Twitter has pulled all advertising bought by Russia Today (RT) and Sputnik on its platform after concluding that both news organizations attempted to interfere with the 2016 presidential election on behalf of Russia.

“This decision was based on the retrospective work we’ve been doing around the 2016 U.S. election and the U.S. intelligence community’s conclusion that both RT and Sputnik attempted to interfere with the election on behalf of the Russian government,” Twitter said in a statement.

RT and Sputnik accounts will be allowed to continue producing content on Twitter, but can no longer advertise on the social network. Additionally, Twitter said it would donate the $1.9 million of ad revenue it has received from RT to external research into Twitter’s role in civic engagement and elections.

The announcement comes one week before a public hearing on Capitol Hill in which Twitter, Facebook and Google will address the roles they inadvertently played in Russia’s efforts to meddle in American politics.

RT and Sputnik are both Russian state-owned media organizations. In January, an intelligence community assessment said both networks had been used as part of a Russian influence campaign aimed at denigrating Hillary Clinton and undermining the integrity of the 2016 presidential election.

Twitter said it made its decision about RT and Sputnik based on its own internal research and those companies inclusion in the January 2017 intelligence report.

Responding to the announcement on Twitter, RT editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan said RT was “an exemplary @Twitter partner,” then took a shot at its chief executive, Jack Dorsey, who she said had encouraged RT to buy ads around the 2016 election.

“Hope @jack won’t forget to tell @congressdotgov how @Twitter pitched @RT_com to spend big $$s on US elex ad campaign.”

Simonyan included in her tweet a picture that appeared to show a proposal for RT advertising on Twitter.

An RT spokesperson also sent CNN a link to an RT article published Thursday headlined, “Revealed: How Twitter pushes RT to spend big on 2016 US election.”

In response, a Twitter spokesperson told CNN: “We do not have any comment on our private conversations with any advertiser, even a former advertiser.”

Follow this story