Chef Ralph Pagano injured in explosion at new Bimini restaurant

Chef Ralph Pagano, who is the host of Lifetime’s culinary show, “All Mixed Up,” was injured this week in an explosion at his new restaurant in Bimini.

Pagano’s friend, Tony Albelo, told Local 10 News that Pagano was working on his new restaurant  Thursday at Resorts World Bimini and was about to turn on the gas burners when an explosion occurred.

“He turned it on and it exploded. There was a couple other of his crew with him and he took the brunt of the punishment. It exploded on him,” Albelo said. “There was a lot more damage than you would expect, like something like an oven blowing up.” 

Albelo said Pagano was airlifted to Jackson Memorial Hospital’s Ryder Trauma Center, where he is being treated for third-degree burns to his legs and hands.

Albelo said a mutual friend spoke to Pagano and he appeared to be in decent spirits.

“I’m concerned,” he said. “He’s a good friend and a great all-around guy to the restaurant scene in Miami, and South Florida and to the food world.” 

Authorities and officials from JMH did not immediately release further details about the incident or Pagano’s condition.

Pagano owns Naked Taco in Miami Beach, Naked Lunch in Miami and Naked Crab in Fort Lauderdale. He has also made TV appearances on shows like “Hell’s Kitchen” and “Iron Chef.”

Follow this story

Home prices are sky high, but mortgages are still cheap

Real estate is crazy expensive.

The median existing home price climbed to $252,800 in May, according to the National Association of Realtors, exceeding the peak hit in June 2016 of $247,600.

At this point, home prices have been rising every month for more than five years.

While that’s good news for home sellers, buyers are having a tough time finding homes they can afford.

Cities across the U.S. are facing major housing shortages, which means buyers have to compete for homes with bidding wars and offers well above asking price.

“Prices are moving up and properties are moving quickly,” said Danielle Hale, NAR’s managing director of housing research.

Builders aren’t building enough houses to keep up with demand and current homeowners are hesitant to list their properties because they’re worried they won’t be able to buy a new home.

“We have tremendous demand for housing, but there is nothing available to buy, said Keith Gumbinger, vice president of HSH.com.

Making matters worse, rents have also been on the rise,which means it’s harder for potential buyers to save up for a home in the first place.

But there has been one saving grace for buyers: mortgage rates.

Even though the Federal Reserve has begun raising interest rates, mortgages have been hovering below 4% recently. Last week, the average rate of a 30-year fixed mortgage ticked down to 3.90%.

“Falling mortgage rates help to soften the blow of rising home prices,” said Gumbinger.

In the weeks after the presidential election, mortgage rates rose above 4% on enthusiasm for economic improvement. But as that optimism started to wane, rates fell again, Gumbinger said.

They’ve remained below 4% for the last five weeks.

“After the elections, there was fantastic enthusiasm we would get fiscal policy changes and the economy was going to drive forward faster,” said Gumbinger. “Not a whole lot has been accomplished on that front … and that has confused the market and dampened enthusiasm.”

With the Fed raising rates, interest rates are expected to gradually rise over time, but should stay pretty low for the foreseeable future.

Gumbinger expects rates to be a little more higher by the end of they year.

“We could have a ‘peak week’ of perhaps 4.5% between now and the end of the year, ” he said.

Follow this story

Who gets hurt and who gets helped by the Senate health care bill

Republicans are one step closer to fulfilling their years-long pledge to repeal and replace Obamacare.

The Senate unveiled its legislation to dismantle the health reform law on Thursday. While it’s likely to change before lawmakers vote on it — possibly late next week — it’s already clear who will benefit and who will lose under the Senate plan.

Though senators promised to write their own repeal bill, their proposals largely mirror the House legislation. Both would radically overhaul Medicaid, effectively ending Medicaid expansion and greatly reducing federal support for the overall program. Both would get rid of the individual and employer mandates, as well as eliminate taxes on the wealthy, insurers and others.

But the Senate bill also differs in significant ways. It would provide subsidies based on income, cost of coverage and age, jettisoning the House plan to base assistance mainly on age. It would maintain Obamacare’s ban on allowing insurers to charge higher premiums to those with pre-existing conditions. And it would shore up the individual market for the next two years by allocating money for Obamacare cost-sharing subsidies and by creating a fund to help insurers cover high-cost enrollees.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said the legislation would make health insurance more affordable, strengthen Medicaid and stabilize the insurance market. But a wide array of critics slam the bill, saying it would send premiums and deductibles skyrocketing for many, eviscerate Medicaid and leave millions uninsured.

The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office is expected to issue its analysis of the bill early next week. Until then, CNNMoney lays out how the plan would affect Americans.

Who gets helped

Younger Americans could pay less for coverage. Like its counterpart in the House, the Senate plan would lower premiums for younger Americans by allowing insurers to charge older enrollees more.

Policyholders age 20 to 29 would save between $700 and $4,000 a year, on average, according to a study by the Milliman actuarial firm on behalf of the AARP Public Policy Institute.

Also, unlike Obamacare, the Senate bill would provide more generous subsidies to enrollees in their 20s and 30s who qualify for aid. They would pay no more than 6.4% and 8.9% of their household income, respectively, towards premiums. That compares to 16.2% for an enrollee in his early 60s.

The healthy could buy less expensive plans that cover fewer services. Obamacare requires insurers to offer plans with comprehensive coverage that pick up a certain share of the average costs. But those mandates also made policies more costly, prompting complaints from those who don’t want such a rich benefits package.

The Senate bill would allow states to opt out of those provisions, which would permit insurers to sell slimmer, but less expensive plans. That would likely be fine for healthy consumers who don’t go to the doctor much.

The wealthy would pay less in taxes. Just as in the House bill, the Senate legislation would eliminate two taxes that Obamacare levied on the wealthy to help pay for the law. Under the Affordable Care Act, single taxpayers with incomes above $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000 annually have to pay an additional 0.9% Medicare payroll tax on the amount they earn above these thresholds. These taxpayers may also be hit with a tax surcharge of 3.8% on investment income above those thresholds. These levies would disappear in 2023 and 2017, respectively.

And the bill would allow folks to contribute more to Health Savings Accounts, which are primarily used by Americans who are better off and can afford to sock money away for health care expenses.

Insurers would receive more federal funds. Aiming to stabilize the individual market in the near term, the Senate would allocate funds for the cost sharing subsidies until 2019. These payments reduce the deductibles and co-pays for more than half of policyholders on the Obamacare exchanges. Insurers have been pressuring President Trump and congressional Republicans to guarantee the funding of the subsidies for months. The uncertainty surrounding the payments is prompting some carriers to hike rates for 2018 or drop out of the exchanges.

The bill also provides $50 billion over four years, starting in 2018, to help stabilize the insurance market. This reinsurance fund would give federal injections to insurers to help them cover higher-cost enrollees.

Who gets hurt

Many Obamacare enrollees will pay more out-of-pocket for health care services. There are several measures in the Senate bill that would increase deductibles and co-pays for many Obamacare policyholders.

The primary one ties the premiums subsidies to the cost of bronze plans instead of silver ones, upon which Obamacare payments are based.

In 2017, the average deductible for a silver plan is just under $3,600, according to Health Pocket, an insurance shopping site. But bronze plans have an average deductible of nearly $6,100. This means consumers will likely have to pay more out of pocket to see the doctor and get treatment.

Also, insurers will be able to cover less of the cost of care and offer skimpier policies in states that waive certain Obamacare insurance regulations. They would also be able to sell plans with very high deductibles if states opt out of the Obamacare provision that caps consumers’ out-of-pocket costs. In 2017, policyholders only have to pay up to $7,150 a year for services covered under the essential health benefits provision.

The Senate bill does provide $62 billion in state grants to lower premiums and out-of-pocket costs for Obamacare enrollees, particularly those who are sick. But experts say the money wouldn’t go very far.

Lower-income Americans could be left uninsured. About 11 million Americans gained coverage under Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion provision. The Senate bill would eliminate the enhanced federal funding for the program by 2024. While that extends Medicaid expansion’s life for a few years longer than the House bill, the end result is the same: Low-income adults would likely be kicked off the rolls.

Lawmakers would also limit federal support for the overall Medicaid program, which covers more than 70 million low-income children, parents, elderly and disabled Americans. States don’t have the resources to make up the difference, so they would likely reduce eligibility, curtail benefits or cut provider payments.

All this would likely leave poor Americans either without coverage or with plans that cover fewer services. It may also make it harder to see a doctor since fewer physicians may be willing to take a pay cut to see Medicaid patients.

While the Senate bill would open up the subsidies to enrollees below the poverty level who don’t qualify for Medicaid, it’s questionable whether the poor could afford coverage even with federal assistance.

Senators would also eliminate the cost-sharing subsidies — which reduce deductibles and co-pays for lower-income Obamacare enrollees — in 2020. More than half of those who buy policies on the exchanges qualify for this assistance, which can shrink their deductibles to as little as a few hundred dollars a year.

Older enrollees would see premiums soar. Americans in their 50s and early 60s benefited from Obamacare because insurers could only charge them three times more than younger policyholders. The bill would widen that band to five-to-one.

That would mean that adults ages 60 to 64 would see their annual premiums soar 22% to nearly $18,000, according to the Milliman study for the AARP. Those in their 50s would be hit with a 13% increase and pay an annual premium of $12,800.

What’s more, the Senate bill would provide less generous subsidies to older folks who are eligible for assistance. Those in their early 60s would have to pay up to 16.2% of their income towards coverage, compared to a maximum of 6.4% for 20-somethings.

Fewer middle class Americans would qualify for subsidies. The Senate bill would tighten the eligibility criteria for premium subsidies starting in 2020, shutting out more middle class folks from government help.

Only those earning up to 350% of the poverty level ($41,600 in 2017) would qualify, rather than the 400% threshold ($47,500 in 2017) contained in Obamacare.

Those with pre-existing conditions or opioid addictions may receive fewer covered services. Under Obamacare, insurers must provide 10 essential health benefits, including maternity, mental health, substance abuse and prescription drugs. The Senate bill would allow states to seek waivers of this provision, opening the door for insurers to offer less comprehensive policies.

This means those with pre-existing conditions may not be able to buy plans that cover all of their treatments and care.

Follow this story

Florida boy, 12, bitten by water moccasin

A north Florida boy is recovering at Wolfson Children’s Hospital in Jacksonville after he was bitten by a venomous water moccasin Wednesday night. 

It happened just as the sun was going down, when Nathaniel Jones, 12, was walking through his front yard in Macclenny, his father told WJXT on Thursday.

“I was on FaceTime with my wife and about 8 o’clock, he was walking through the yard and the snake bit him, so he ran in the house and he was panicking that he was going to die. She kept trying to calm him down,” Jason Jones, Nathaniel’s father, said. “They called 911. They came and took him to a local Fraser hospital. Fraser (staff) determine to send him to Wolfson and he’s been here ever since.”

Jones said he was working in South Florida at the time and traveled to the Jacksonville hospital as soon as he could after the water moccasin bit his son on the foot.

“Hopefully, he gets out fine,” Jones said. “From now on, he’s going to wear shoes and watch out where he’s walking through the yard.”

Jones said his son, who is in good spirits and smiling, received his third dose of antivenin at 6 p.m. Thursday. The father said he’s hopeful the third dose will be successful so his son doesn’t have to undergo surgery.

Not only has this been hard on Nathaniel, Jones said, but also he and his wife. 

“For me, it’s just scary because I’m four hours away from her. She’s nervous because it’s her baby and she doesn’t know what to do,” Jones said. “She can’t help him. She just has to sit there and watch him go through it and hopefully he gets out fine.”

The family lives near a retention pond, so snakes are common. But Jones said he never imagined his son would be bitten by one. 

He hopes it serves as a warning to other parents to be extra cautious this summer. 

“If you let your kid go out, make sure they watch where they go look for snakes, any objects, where they could get hurt,” Jones said. “This could happen to anybody.”

After Nathaniel was bit, Jones said, they were able to kill the snake and then gave it to paramedics when they arrived. At the hospital, doctors were able to determine it was a water moccasin, which helped them determine how to treat Nathaniel. 

Jeff Altman, a local snake expert with American Trappers, said Nathaniel’s family did the right thing by safely killing and keeping the snake for paramedics. 

Jones said Nathaniel is not allowed to leave the hospital bed until there’s more improvement in his foot and the swelling goes down.

Follow this story

Police seek to identify older man found at Miramar McDonalds

Miramar police are asking for the public’s help in identifying an older man who was found this week at a McDonalds restaurant.

Police said a concerned patron Wednesday at the McDonalds at 17002 Miramar Parkway took the man to Memorial Hospital Miramar.

Police said the man speaks English, but does not know who he is or how he got to the McDonalds.

Police said he has a scar on his right knee and was wearing multiple rings on each hand.

He is believed to be between the ages of 70 and 80.

Anyone with information about his identity is asked to call police at 954-602-4000.

Follow this story