Just because Dan Barker wishes to be free from religion (consequently so do all self respecting Christians, as religion and Christianity don't mix), does that mean that we God fearing people have to read his diatribe of dribble advocating evolutionism?
His contentionism for the sake of contentionism is very watery at best and if he did his homework he would know that Darwin himself said that "Origin of the Species" was only a theory and that he had nothing tangible to back it up. Like flies to the preverbial dungheap Dan Barker has been drawn in. Rule of thumb, if something smells as if it stinks, it usually DOES!!!!
As much as he might dislike it, there is abundantly more evidence to prove creation than there could ever hope to be for evolution or any other excuse to distance ourselves from the truth. Has he ever wondered why so much effort goes into trying to disprove creationism? Probably not! The reality is that people don't want to accept God and his creation of the world simply because if they did they would have to make a lot of ammends in their lives and that simply is not something they wish to do. I guess some people just want to continue to rebell no matter what the cost.
I find it hard to understand that someone could be so blind as to attack another for supposedly having smelly thinking when his own mind hasn't cleared from his own rot.
I hope he realises his folly in time.
Oh, and for the record Dan, wolves attack sheep and as creationists are the sheep of God's flock that would make you the Wolf in Cheaper clothing
Keven Craig
Happy Christian