Britain To Set Out Legal Justification For Overseas Drone Strikes

British Prime Minister David Cameron, left, and French President Francois Hollande stand backdropped by a model of a concept design for a future unmanned combat air vehicle as they wait for memorandums of understandings and an agreement to be signed before the start of their press conference at their one-day summit at the RAF Brize Norton air base in Brize Norton, England, Friday, Jan. 31, 2014. The one-day summit covered military cooperation, including talks over armed drones, anti-ship missiles, and underwater mine detectors, as well as a joint Franco-British force of 10,000 soldiers due to be formed in the next few years. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham)

Former British Prime Minister David Cameron, left, and French President Francois Hollande stand backdropped by a model of a concept design for a future unmanned combat air vehicle at the RAF Brize Norton air base in Brize Norton, England, Friday, Jan. 31, 2014. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham)

The UK’s Attorney General is to set out the legal basis for military strikes against overseas targets for the first time.

Jeremy Wright QC will on Wednesday argue that new technological threats mean the battleground is “irretrievably altered” and that it is necessary for the UK to use lethal force abroad.

“The UK is a world leader in promoting, defending and shaping international law – and for the first time we are setting out how we determine whether an attack is imminent,” Wright will say in London.

“We are a long way from being able to see troops massing on the horizon. The frontline has irretrievably altered. Technology has made it easier for terrorists to carry out attacks.

“The law has to keep up with the changing times. The government has a primary duty to protect the lives of its citizens. But it can only use lethal force where there is a clear legal basis for doing so.”

Scrutiny of legality of strikes abroad has intensified since September 2015 when then prime minister David Cameron revealed that an RAF drone had killed two British militants in Syria in August.

Reyaad Khan and Ruhul Amin were killed when the strike was launched by drone near the Islamic State stronghold of Raqqa.

Amnesty International condemned the attack, saying it was “extremely alarming that the UK has apparently been conducting summary executions from the air”.

MPs and peers have called for ministers to clarify the legal basis for drone strikes, citing a lack of oversight.

Wright’s speech in London on Wednesday will lay out the legal basis for such attacks in greater detail than ever before.

 

More drones for Britain

In early December, Britain announced it was to double its fleet of armed drones, agreeing a $127m deal for a new generation of US-made aircraft for the Royal Air Force.

The defence secretary, Michael Fallon, said the government planned to arm the new Protector drones with advanced Brimstone missiles and Paveway laser-guided bombs.

Fallon’s ministry said the aircraft is being developed by the US firm General Atomics, which manufactures the Reaper drone at present in use in the US and UK air forces.

The UK currently has 10 Reapers in service, which the Protectors are scheduled to replace in 2021.

“Britain faces ever-evolving threats and we must look at innovative solutions to stay ahead of our enemies,” Fallon said.

“Doubling investment in our unmanned air fleet will substantially enhance both the intelligence gathering and firepower of the RAF.

“The UK’s security partnership with the US is the deepest and most advanced of any two nations on earth.

“This programme is part of a further strengthening which will help keep Britain safe and secure.”

According to Janes, the British government announced initial plans in April to buy up to 20 of the new drones in a $528m programme lasting seven years.

The defence ministry said the Protector “will offer improved range and endurance, greater weapons capacity, automated take-off and landing and better resilience against the elements”.

Janes said Protector has a maximum endurance of more than 40 hours compared with the Reaper’s 27 hours, but a lower top speed and altitude – suggesting the UK is prioritising increased endurance and persistence in future operations.

The use of British-made Brimstone missiles would significantly increase the firepower of the new drones. Predators and Reapers currently carry the inferior “Hellfire” missile.

Fallon made the announcement at the annual Reagan National Defence Forum in California.


© Middle East Eye

The post Britain To Set Out Legal Justification For Overseas Drone Strikes appeared first on MintPress News.

This BBSNews article was syndicated from MintPress News, and written by Middle East Eye. Read the original article here.